Afghan filmmakers union under fire for poor management
Some Afghan film makers are lambasting at leadership of the Afghan Filmmakers Union (AFU), for what they call violation of union’s approved procedures. They claim that contrary to AFU procedure, Jawan Sher Haidari has been leading the union for more than ten years.
According to the endorsed procedure of the AFU, the union’s director, its leadership, and administrative board members need to be elected by a congress held annually by the AFU members, but the union has failed to hold a congress since the establishment of the AFU.
Mohammad Khadim Haidari, a film
director and documentary maker, who has been working in Afghan cinema industry
for the last 18 years, has not obtained the AFU membership. He alleges that the
union’s membership does not makes any difference for a filmmaker, describing
the union’s performance as inefficient.
“When it comes to [selecting films to
be sent for] Oscars award nomination, they make just some gathering and that’s
all,” he said. The Afghan documentary maker also said that the AFU does not and
will not have any influence on Afghanistan cinema. “Why its director and
leadership board has remained unchanged for years?” he questioned.
Masood Islami, an Afghan filmmaker who has been working in Afghan film industry for 13 years, has also hesitated to get union’s membership. He clearly expresses distrust over the union, arguing that the union officials have neither developed their personal capacities, nor did provide capacity building opportunities for other filmmakers. As an alternative to the union, he proposes establishing a new union with a fresh board of leadership. “Except those around him, the union’s head does not listen to other filmmakers.”
Members of AFU acknowledge
Criticisms over mismanagement and carelessness of the AFU over its scope of operation even come from within the union. Latif Ahmadi, who is a member of the union for over ten years, acknowledges that there are very strong and true complaints against the AFU. “The union has never done anything special in cinema. It occasionally introduces its members to the Ministry of Information and Culture via an [official] letter just for medical treatment.”
He accuses Mr. Haidari and leadership
of the AFU of deliberately hesitating to convene its annual congress and
provide circumstances for reporting on performance of the union.
Farid Azim, deputy head of the AFU, however, said that no one was willing to take responsibility for the union and makes ‘sacrifice’ like its current head, Jawan Sher Haidar. “Members of the union have not paid their membership fees for years, therefore, they do not have the right to elect or be elected,” he argued.
Azim said that they have called on
filmmakers several times in separate meetings to make their presence to elect
AFU’s head and leadership board members but in vein. “Those who are making
films for Afghanistan are members of the union but we can do nothing for those
who are making films for foreign film festivals. They can neither align their
mindsets with ours,” the deputy of the AFU stated.
AFU’s headquarter is in Kabul and it
has functional offices in Germany and Netherland. According to him, the union
also has regional offices in Nangarhar, Kunduz, and Herat provinces.
Oscar nomination and disputes
raised by Afghan filmmakers
Citing the Screen Daily,
Shahrbanoo Sadat, an Afghan filmmaker, claimed that the Academy has
disqualified Afghanistan’s Oscars entry “Hava, Maryam, Ayisha” directed by
Sahra Karimi from initial list due to questions raised over the country’s
selection committee in charge of selecting Afghanistan submission for Oscars
The Afghan filmmaker claimed that the
selection committee, influenced by Sahra Karimi, has introduced her film for
After her post, some Afghan filmmakers
widely questioned the selection criteria of selection committee, accusing Mr. Haidari
of having a monopoly on the process.
Samiullah Atayee, a university lecturer
and filmmaker, was selected as a member of the selection committee by the AFU.
He, however, questions selection process and says he has been selected
randomly. “The selection board members are selected without collective
decision. There is no reporting and accountability,” he added.
He, however, rejects that the selection
board members have selected Sahra Karimi’s drama for Oscar nomination due to
her influence, saying that the process was completely transparent.
Latif Ahmadi, another member of the
AFU, says that he has been a member of the selection committee and the
committee members are selected by the union’s head without involvement of other
filmmakers. “They—union members—call and say ‘you have been selected as a
member of selection committee for Oscar’. There are people in the committee who
do not have any expertise about cinema and picks up the films selectively,” he
The 2019 members of the selection committee are Latif Ahmadi, a filmmaker; Sami Nabipoor, a university lecturer; Samiullah Atayee, a film director, Mirwais Rekab, a filmmaker; Homaira Qaderi, a writer and women rights activist, and Hamid Arefi, a journalist.